HealthTechnica.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
February 10, 2012, 07:42:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Newly Upgraded to SMF version 2.0
1391 Posts in 1139 Topics by 10705 Members
Latest Member: Vanda7
Home Help Search Login Register
HealthTechnica.com  |  Open Category  |  Open Discussion  |  Topic: Super-Bee, Roadrunner, or GTO?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Super-Bee, Roadrunner, or GTO?  (Read 4603 times)
rilescat
Administrator
Jr. Member
*****
Posts: 97


View Profile HealthTechnica.com
« on: December 06, 2009, 09:37:19 PM »
Which is most awesome?

Super-Bee:
http://ultimateperformancecar.com/BlogImages/plymouth_superbee.jpg

Roadrunner:
http://www.carbodydesign.com/archive/2009/06/24-plymouth-road-runner-concept/Plymouth-Road-Runner-lg.jpg

GTO:
http://www.classiccar-buyersguide.com/Resized_1967-Pontiac-GTO-muscle-car-wallpaper.jpg
Logged
http://HealthTechnica.com
Patients First, Technology First
Vanplor.Crucible
Newbie
*
Posts: 4

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2010, 01:26:53 PM »
If we are talking classics lets not forget the Olds 442, but these days it all depends what you build into it. If we are talking modern, I'll stick with my new stang.
Logged
KateMikaila
Global Moderator
Newbie
*****
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2010, 02:14:18 PM »
The first two are ugly as sin.. so definitely the Pontiac. Personally, I'll take a Mustang Shelby.. 69.
Logged
Join the conversation www.walktheway.net
x96Exr
Newbie
*
Posts: 1

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2011, 05:16:58 AM »
For me it's Pontiac. But my fave one was green Shelby GT 500...

Best Sleeping Bags   
High Peak Kathmandu   
Syma S107

« Last Edit: May 23, 2011, 05:19:26 AM by x96Exr » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
HealthTechnica.com  |  Open Category  |  Open Discussion  |  Topic: Super-Bee, Roadrunner, or GTO? « previous next »
 
Powered by MySQL HealthTechnica.com Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 RC2 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!